There's been a lot of stuff being posted about the future of magazines, newspapers, journalists, in fact anything to do with print. Karl Schneider, Editorial Director at RBI, had makes some good points on his blog about the future role of the production desk.
Part of my remit at Flight and ICIS is to ensure that our magazines are not just online text versions of the printed articles, but a different, richer, offering. This could include things such as the original recorded interview available as a podcast, truly interactive information graphics and video.
Now, to get to this stage means that the information gatherers (aka journalists) think about how they gather the information, what information they gather and how it will appear. In the past, the final offering was a double page spread with a picture of the bloke being interviewed, the location (maybe) and a couple of links at the end to relevant websites. Obviously (I say obviously, but you'd be surprised how many people don't or won't get it) it's time to think about all the stuff that can be offered, then pare it down for print.
This means, arguably, a different approach to laying out a feature if you have the rich version online. Do you have the full text article online or just in print? Do you have an extended (uncut?) version online or have a precis and refer to the print version?
My concern is that the design of both print and web complement each other. It reinforces the brand awareness. As Mark Porter, Creative Director at the Guardian, said at a symposium late last year, the online version doesn't need to look exactly like the print version. Elements can be used that are common to both. For example the colour palette or pullquote style, even some of the font usage. And refer to the print version as well.
Designers need to be able to lay out a web page as easily as they can a printed page. An online version of Quark or InDesign. Something that is as easy to use as these packages, with similar functionality such as style sheets, text control and colour palettes. There are few things more depressing than creating a visual of a web page then giving it to the developers to code and getting something that sort of looks like what you want, but Microsofted (Mac users, you know what I mean, the subtleness of a Mac is lost somehow missing on a PC). But it's not just the ability to use a software package. Print designers need to be retrained to appreciate how a web page works: type usage, where does the reader look first, image use, colour use. We designers are visually literate and know the mechanics of a printed page, it shouldn't take much to build on that. A lot of editorial designers I know were put off web design because of the perceived notion of all the coding that would need to be done. And why should we have somebody else lay out the feature on the web? After all, if you've gone to great lengths in commissioning a photograph or illustration, you would've thought about how it was going to work with the rest of the layout – the interaction with the headline or standfirst, for example. Obviously if you are commissioning this stuff (lucky you!) then you'll also be able to think about how it will be used on the web.
And as Karl said in his blog, new skills will also have to learnt: maybe a bit of Flash or some video editing, for example. This should be straightforward. A lot of designers already dabble with this sort of stuff, even if it's in their own time. We are already heading back to the time when designer meant just that, a DESIGNER who can (and want to) turn their hand to most design problems. Think of Eric Gill: type designer, architect, sculptor, engraver and artist; or Neville Brody, type designer, who went from record sleeve design, to art director of seminal publication the Face, to web design (the Guardian website, for one) and online communication. He redesigned the Times a couple of years ago.
At RBI we are moving our web platforms over to something called EpiServer. This, apparently, will offer us a lot of the functionality we (as magazine designers) would like. We are told it will be as easy to use as InDesign, It will offer a host of other things as well, such as the ability to move things around a screen a la Netvibes. It is also being touted that it so easy to use anybody can design a page and upload it.
This is where I start to have reservations. Not everyone has a designers' eye for detail or composition or colour awareness. And not to detract from the enthusiasm that these people have, there needs to be safeguards in place so that the professional image of the brand/publication are not damaged. Printed publications have a workflow in place to ensure the best possible product is delivered in the time available. It would be reasonable to assume that a design workflow suitable for web-first publishing is established to ensure that high standards are maintained. Designers need to be part of this discussion.
What do you think?
That is the very reason why even small businesses nowadays should have a website for them to still be visible even if the printing world's days are over.
Posted by: small business webdesign | 15 November 2011 at 03:51
If you want to buy a house, you would have to get the personal loans. Furthermore, my brother all the time takes a commercial loan, which occurs to be the most fast.
Posted by: loan | 07 October 2011 at 04:24
I had got a desire to make my own firm, however I didn't have got enough amount of money to do it. Thank God my fellow said to take the loans. Thence I used the term loan and made real my dream.
Posted by: business loans | 08 August 2011 at 23:21
Great article! It's very informative, straight to the point and well-organized. Hope you'll post more articles like this. Thanks for your insights and for posting. Kudos!
Posted by: domain hosting | 25 January 2011 at 04:12
I have worked for 2-3 years solely as a print designer (postcards, business cards, brochures, flyers) -- but I want to expand my skill base as a graphic designer by learning how to do web design (it also happens to pay much more handsomely). I can make graphics and pictures for a website fairly easily, but when it comes to the tools and coding needing to actually create a site, I'm a bit lost. What tools/lessons are there that I should use? (If you can please suggest free/open source programs)
Posted by: orange county web development | 30 September 2010 at 07:57
What I want to do is print images of my favorite sports players and frame them. You know, like the ones that they overprice in sports shops. I figure it will be much cheaper for me to do myself.
Posted by: orange county web development | 23 September 2010 at 08:45
What I want to do is print images of my favorite sports players and frame them. You know, like the ones that they overprice in sports shops. I figure it will be much cheaper for me to do myself.
Posted by: computer service orange county | 01 September 2010 at 08:35
Following my monitoring, billions of persons on our planet receive the credit loans at good creditors. So, there's good chances to get a college loan in every country.
Posted by: business loans | 07 March 2010 at 09:28
If some people are stuck with critical essay writing, thence I will offer to buy an essay uk at some good custom writing service under such circumstances.
Posted by: Elisabetta18 | 16 February 2010 at 04:04
I do really would like to to thank you for your great thought just about this topic. I guess that you require the help of a professional article submit service or the different article submission to do your article impelling.
Posted by: KristinKp19 | 15 January 2010 at 02:53
yup i like the comment by jack, this is really a nice topic. hoping to see more interesting comments or new posts like this.
Posted by: Logo Design | 30 December 2009 at 08:11
Thank you that you composed the best writing related to this good post. Though, to detect the best essay writing services, you must have some knowledge about order essay.
Posted by: CatherinHO34 | 25 December 2009 at 15:43
'Not everyone has a designers' eye for detail or composition or colour awareness.'
Interesting.....
But you have kind of missed the point, about on-line content!
The NET (as a generic term) is not about Design, or Composition, or Colour Awareness, or even detail for that matter.
It is about communication!
You only have to look at your post and see how there are no paras, no breaks, no point at which the reader is able to take a 'breath' and actually read and take in the content, where is the: 'designers' eye for detail or composition'.
But, nevertheless, whilst you have ignored your own: 'eye for detail', you have clearly embraced the NET, and totally ignored any detail or composition.
It is your post, and as such you should and are able to pontificate and ramble on for endless continuous paras without any, well.... breaks!.
You may know how to design the 'perfect' page, for a 'paper' based reading medium, by the looks of it, you have little or no idea on how to compose a piece for the NET.
But, magazine printing is a trade that is lessening by the day, it will continue to exist in a far lesser consumable way than it is now.
The future is not about how 'you have an eye for detail and composition': It's about how the 'consumer' can get the relevant information, in a compact and 'consumable way', with total and complete disregard for 'Detail, Colour or Composition'
Posted by: Jack Jones | 06 August 2009 at 00:38